Verizon claims that it has 5 times more 3G coverage as compared to AT&T. Given the vast size of
Now let’s see what Maxis,
Maxis 3G coverage as of Nov 20, 2009…
(Click to enlarge)
吉隆坡日前发生一宗男子开枪挟持前女友的事件。星洲日报作如是报道：
23岁巫裔男子疑与女友感情生变，在女友工作的美发院失控发狂，向墙壁及天花板连开3枪，且一度把女友挟持作人质，不过最终被赶抵的警官劝服，5分钟后弃械投降。
这起“姐弟恋生变，男子发狂开枪恐吓女友”事件，是于今日中午12时30分，发生在安邦waterfront 3一间位于二楼的美法院。35岁的巫裔受害者是美发院女东主，相信此事件与感情纠纷有关。。。
（星洲日报2009年11月14日）
英文星报The Star也报道了这起事件。这是摘要：
A 23-year-old jilted boyfriend held his beautician girlfriend at gunpoint to win her back in a two-hour hostage drama.
In the incident at Taman Kosas, Ampang, the man arrived at the hair salon, owned by the 35-year-old woman who ended their relationship several weeks back, at about 9.30am. He waited for her in his car for over an hour before storming into the salon, demanding to speak to her. When she refused, a shouting match broke out and a struggle ensued with the woman being assaulted by the former boyfriend who used to work as a caretaker at the salon…
(The Star, November 14, 2009)
星洲日报在文中的第一句子就指出嫌犯是马来人（巫裔），第二段又说明女受害者也同样是巫裔。The Star则完全没有提到两人的族裔。不过，11月15日The Star报道此事件发展时，在文中第三段提到女事主是新加坡人。
我比较能够接受The Star的报道方式。星洲日报有种族歧视之嫌。
In my post, Firefly vs. AirAsia, I wrote:
I hadn’t got a ruler with me, but my feeling is that Firefly’s planes have slightly larger legroom [as compared to AirAsia].
After doing some research over the Web, I finally got the figures for seat pitch of the two airlines. Seat pitch is defined as “the distance between two rows of seats”, or “the measurement from the same position on two seats, one behind the other.” While seat pitch is not the same as legroom, it’s a good alternative measure.
The seat pitch for AirAsia is 29 inches, and that for Firefly is 30 inches. That pretty much confirms my observation.
AirAsia X, the sister company of AirAsia, has slightly larger seat pitch at 31”. The seat pitch for economy class of Malaysia Airlines, according to the information I got online, is 34”. However, Malaysia Airlines’ fleet consists of many different planes, and it is not sure if all of them have the same seat pitch. If you think 34” is still too tight, you can opt for business class, which gives you 58” space.
Across the causeway, the seat pitches for Singapore Airlines (economy class), Jetstar Asia and Tiger Airways are 32”, 30” and 28.5” respectively. I can’t believe that Tiger Airways is even stingier than AirAsia!
Personally, I am comfortable with 30”. Nonetheless, for routes not covered by Firefly, I have to bear with AirAsia.
What can you do with Twitter, other than announcing to your followers what movies you watch and where you have your dinner?
American chef Roy Choi has found an ingenious use of the micro-blogging site. He sells Korean BBQ taco from his mobile kiosk – a truck. (Taco is originally a type of Mexican food, but Choi has added Korean touch to it.) He announces his whereabouts via Twitter alerts. (The End of
That’s a creative use of technology, isn’t it?
今年的11月9日，是柏林围墙倒塌20周年纪念。当年柏林围墙的倒塌，让东、西德重归统一，也间接导致冷战的结束。
冷战期间，共有四个国家分裂为资本主义和共产主义两个阵营。除了德国，另三个为中国（大陆和台湾）、韩国和越南。南、北越在打了多年的血腥战争后，最终共军攻陷南方。中国和韩国则还是处于分裂状态。
前东、西德其实早在上个世纪的70年代就已经建立邦交，两国和平共处，并承认对方政府的合法性。我曾经在图书馆看过前西德出版的地图，上面清楚显示东德是个别的国家。相反的，大陆和台湾仍然互不承认，北京也不允许其他国家和台北建立邦交。
中国人和韩国人喊统一喊了数十年，至今还未能如愿以偿。当年的东德人和西德人泰然接受国土分裂的事实，反而能和平统一。
中国、韩国和越南的社会都受儒家思想影响深远。三个国家在冷战期间有着同样的遭遇绝非偶然。儒家最强调爱国。但是中、韩、越人民对国家太过执着，不能忍受领土分裂，并且不惜以武力解决。这正是导致他们不能仿效德意志民族的原因。
Recently, I learned of a technique, from book, for taking ‘night view’ photos, and decided to put it into practice. Hence, I headed to KLCC. Here are a few of my photos…
At 6.50pm…
At 7.00pm…
At 7.06pm…
Strictly speaking, I am not very satisfied with these images. I had not brought along my tripod, and was handicapped by that. Perhaps I will have another try in the near future.
Photography Tips:
‘Night view’ photos are best taken when the sky is still bluish, preferably with twilight. Do not wait until it is completely dark. Timing is critical.
It is advisable to stabilize the camera using a tripod.
我在英文帖子The Chinese Diaspora中指出：中國人一方面強烈愛國，另一方面又老是想移居海外。但他們的愛國心，可能會妨礙他們融入當地社會。
香港作家陶傑在評論中國電影《月滿英倫》時也有類似看法。《月滿英倫》描寫一對中國戀人在英國的經歷。陶傑這麼寫：
問題是：這對男女主角無法融入英國社會，是他們自己出了毛病。他們揹著大陸的包袱出國，一個緬懷著毛澤東時代的中國，另一個放不下鄧小平時代的中國。他們肉體上到了一個自由的國度，精神上卻還沒有走出從前的大牢籠。。。他們既想要英國護照，又受不了英國的生活。他們硬說中國的月亮比英國圓，但又不肯回國去擁抱自己的月亮。除了他們自己，沒有人須對他們的慘境負責。
In my post,
‘Cut Now’ commercial (Cantonese version) on Youtube…
The controversy caused by P1 reminds me of Japanese commercial for Wacoal Up-Up bra. In this commercial, a man drops his document when he sees a pretty lady at the elevator. The lady lowered her body to pick up the paper. It’s at this moment that the guy sees her breasts, enhanced by the Up-Up bra.
18SX! Up-Up bra on Youtube…
I gather that this kind of ads will never make it to Malaysian TV. But let’s assume for a moment that it does, what would happen?
Religious groups would condemn it as obscene and polluting the minds of youths.
Women’s groups would criticize it as a form of gender discrimination.
What do you think of the two commercials? Are they distasteful or creative? Are we too conservative?
