Monday, March 31, 2008

Clothesline

A couple of years ago, I worked briefly, on a contract basis, in California. (I wasn’t a low wage worker!) I realized that Americans, unlike people in this region, did not dry their laundry under the sun. Instead, they relied on clothes dryers. (The only exception I came across took place in a forest monastery which generated electricity from solar panels.) That year, the failed "energy deregulation" brought electricity outages in California.

I couldn’t understand why Americans, or at least Californians, did not use clotheslines. After all, the Golden State was sunny for most of the year, and it only rained in the winter. On the other hand, people in Southeast Asia who dry their clothes under the sun have to worry about late afternoon downpour.

It wasn’t until last year before I knew the reason. American homeowners are concerned that clothesline – not exactly something aesthetic – could cause depreciation of their properties.

However, an environmentalist named Alexander Lee is advocating the use of clothesline to replace the clothes dryer. He lists many reasons for doing so:

  • Save money – more than $100/year on electric bill for most households.
  • Conserve energy and the environment.
  • Clothes and sheets smell better.
  • Clothes last longer. Where do you think lint comes from?
  • It is physical activity which you can do in or outside.
  • Sunlight bleaches and disinfects.
  • Indoor racks can humidify in dry winter weather.
  • Clothes dryer fires account for about 15,600 structure fires, 15 deaths, and 400 injuries annually. The yearly national fire loss for clothes dryer fires in structure is estimated at $99 million.

(Source: Project Laundry List)

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Imperialism - history revisited

This may sound very unpatriotic. As students, we learned that the British exploited the wealth of Malaysia when they ruled this country. That Malays were impoverished because they were neglected by the colonial governments. That racial polarity in this country was a result of their Divide and Conquer strategy. After independence, the government renamed many streets as if to erase our “painful memory”. Now I am suggesting that British rule of Malaysia is not all bad. This is absolutely absurd. Or is it?

Chris Pattern, the last governor of Hong Kong, said that even though the Britons wrestled the colony from China by force, they nonetheless put in effort to govern and develop it. He was certainly right to some extent. Hong Kong prospered under British rule. Ironically, the Pearl of the Orient lost its luster after it was reverted to China in 1997. I believe many Hong Kongers prefer British governors to the Beijing-approved Tung Chee Hwa.

Many years ago, when I read Jules Verne’s classic, Around the World in 80 Days, I learned of an ancient tradition in India whereby a widow would jump onto her husband’s cremation pyre. The British colonial government banned this practice. Unfortunately, it has made a comeback in recent decades.

It has been more than half a century since the independence of Malaysia. Perhaps we can be more open-minded now. This is not to glorify imperialism, but to be truthful to our history and to be fair to the British. There is no denying that the British rule had many shortcomings, but they have been discussed in great length in our textbooks. Now I would just highlight a few areas where I think Malaysia has gained from its colonial past.

~~~~~~~~

If we had not been ruled by the Europeans, the country we call Malaysia probably would not exist. Prior to the arrivals of Britons, the Malay kingdoms on the Peninsula were not united. Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan and Terengganu were vassal states of Siam. On the Borneo Island, Sarawak was part of Brunei, while Sabah was under the influence of the Sulu Sultanate. A united Malaya in 1957, and later Malaysia in 1963, is a product of British Empire.

~~~~~~~~

We are told again and again that British exploited the wealth of this country. Let’s face it: they boost efficiency of tin mining by introducing dredge to this country. They also brought rubber trees from Brazil, some of the earliest were planted in my hometown of Kuala Kangsar, Perak.

~~~~~~~~

The colonial government built schools for locals. One of the most famous, also located in my hometown, was the Malay College. It is worth noting that Chinese had to raise fund to build their schools.

~~~~~~~~

Without imperialism I probably would not be writing this post. The British were responsible for bringing Chinese and Indians to this country.

~~~~~~~~

British introduced Common Law to Malaysia, and instilled the concept of rule of law. Prior to this, Malays lived by following Adat (customs) and Islamic law. One may argue that Malaysia’s judiciary system was established by the colonial rulers.

~~~~~~~~

Before they left, the British replaced the absolute monarchies with constitutional ones. Today Malaysia is a democratic nation – though with many flaws.

~~~~~~~~

English was the official language before independence. Today it remains widely spoken. Our proficiency in the lingua franca of the world gives us tremendous advantage in the 21st century.

~~~~~~~~

In short, we did gain from British rule. Of course this doesn’t mean Britain should continue to rule this country after 1957. Just like a grown up person who leaves the parents to start his/her own family, Malaysia should eventually become independent – and we did.

By understanding our history better, we can leave our unnecessary hatred against Westerners behind. More importantly, we have always blamed our problems on the European colonizers. We should now start to look within – 50 years after independence.

Malaysia's oldest rubber tree - in Kuala Kangsar

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Election - Malaysia, Taiwan, China

选举 - 大马,台湾,中国


许多大马华人,都为2008年的选举成绩感到雀跃万分,因为他们用手中一票惩罚了政府。

也有许多大马华人,对台湾选举成绩感到欣慰,因为马英九击败了“独派”的候选人谢长廷。大马华人都希望中台能最终统一。

只是,他们忘了中国是没有民主的国家。。。

Many Chinese Malaysians were happy with the results of general election held recently in the country. They felt that they had managed to “punish” the government with their votes.

Chinese Malaysians also breathed a sigh of relief over the outcome of Taiwan presidential election, in which Ma Ying-jeou defeated the pro-independence candidate Frank Hsieh. Chinese Malaysians generally hope that the island will eventually be united with China.

But they have forgotten that China is a nation without democracy…

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Air Asia X’s passengers stranded

Air Asia, the budget airline of Malaysia, has been notorious for flight delay. But now, its sister company, Air Asia X, rescheduled its flight to an earlier time. Here is the news from The Star (Saturday, March 22, 2008)…

~~~~~~~~~~

More than 20 passengers were left stranded at the Low-Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT), claiming that the boarding gate for their flight to Brisbane was closed earlier than scheduled.

They claimed that the boarding time for Air Asia X Flight D7-2702 to Gold Coast, Australia, closed at 8.30pm, and the flight took off 10 minutes earlier at 9.40pm.

It is learned that most of the stranded passengers were Australians.

The passengers claimed that airline did not inform them about the re-schedule timing in advance.

One of the stranded passengers, Mark Jason Thomas, 28, who is a local, said no one was allowed to get past the boarding gate after 8.30pm.

He said when they checked with airport personnel, they were told that the flight was re-scheduled earlier by 10 minutes.

Another passenger, Mohd Nasir Mohamad Ashraf, said an Air Asia X official suggested that the passengers wait for the next flight to the Gold Coast on Sunday morning.

He said the airline refused to compensate or arrange any accommodation for the stranded tourists.

Thomas said the passengers had all reconfirmed their tickets earlier.

One of the passengers lodged a report on the incident at the LCCT police station.

~~~~~~~~~~

Was it right for Air Asia X to re-schedule its flight without informing the passengers in advance? Was it the passengers’ fault for not checking with the airline? What do you think?

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Green Consumerism II

In my earlier post, I mentioned how greenhouses cause air pollution. Another blogger, Pandabonium, suggested a few ways to preserve the environment, namely:

Buy local. In season. Organic.


Let’s take a closer look…


Buy local

This is Malaysia, a tropical country. Thou shalt not eat apples, oranges, pears, kiwi fruits etc. as they are not grown locally .

OK, perhaps I can travel to New Zealand if I wish to eat kiwi fruits. But I shall not fly, as air plane pollutes the air. Instead, I must sail with a wave-powered boat.


wave-powered boat


In season

We buy ‘in season’ so that we don’t need to rely on greenhouses. Many years ago my aunt, who lived in the Netherlands, told me that she ate lots of meat in winter when veggies were too expensive. By the time warm days returned, she was completely sick of meat.

Vegetables are out of season in winter, but I can’t imagine not eating them for two or three months. And don’t tell vegetarians to change their lifestyle.

Please help me! I want to save our planet, but are there simpler ways to accomplish this?


P/S To learn more about the wave-powered boat, read Pandabonium's post.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

陶杰

最近买了一本陶杰的散文集,其中一篇文章的题目为《乱给汽水盖》,顿时想起:“噢,对了,我们小时也把勋章戏称为汽水盖。”

陶杰,香港人。作品尖酸刻薄,而且敢于批评别人不敢提的事。我虽不完全赞同他的看法,却不得不赞他有才华。

2003年,中国首位太空人升空,举国人民欢腾。身为中国香港人的陶杰,却大泼冷水:

太空船升空,太空人上天后的第一句话,必纪录于历史。这句话,力量千钧,太空人不会说,应该由政府教他说。苏联太空人加加林上太空,第一句话是“我看不见上帝”,代表了共产党的无神论,向西方下战书。

一九六九年,美国太阳神火箭登月,太空人艾德灵和杭思朗步出太空舱,留下一句世纪名言:“这是我迈出的一小步,却是人类迈出的一大步。”

相比之下,中国的太空人说:“自我感觉很好”,“自我感觉良好”,在大陆,这句话是用来嘲讽自以为是之人,浪费了最好的广告时间。

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Efficiency vs. Effectiveness

How is effectiveness different from efficiency?


In MBA, we often say:

To be efficient is to do the thing right.

To be effective is to do the right thing.


Confused? Here is a real example…

Dell outsourced its call centers from North America to India, where wages were low. In doing so, it successfully cut operating costs. Unfortunately, not all American customers of the PC manufacturer were happy. They complained that the Indians spoke an accent that was hard to comprehend, or that they did not understand the customers who were half-way around the globe so well.

Dell’s decision to outsource the call centers was an efficient one, but it may NOT be very effective.

Indian call center

Friday, March 14, 2008

Green Consumerism

Are you a green consumer? Do you bring your own bag or basket when you shop for groceries? Do you shop at stores that use bio-degradable plastic bags?

Environmentalists encourage us to buy produce grown locally. The logic is that imported produce has to be air-freighted, and cargo planes are air polluters.

Now, suppose that you live in UK. You want to buy roses, and you have two options. You can buy roses that are grown in Netherlands, and imported in boats or trains. Alternatively, you can buy roses that are flown in from Kenya. What is your choice?

Apparently, from the perspective of environmentalism, you should buy Dutch roses. But if we boycott Kenya, we may put flower farmers in the African nation out of jobs. Remember that Kenya is a 3rd world country.


So, tell us your choice…

Dutch rose...

... or Kenyan rose?

OK, here is the reality. According to a study at Cranfield University, the carbon footprint of the Dutch roses turns out to be six times as large because they have to be grown in heated greenhouses.

Green consumerism isn’t always as green as we think…


Reference:
The Economist, January 19-25, 2008 issue

Related posts:
Sins of Recycling
Sins of Recycling II